Addition of Lactobacillus plantarum microencapsulated on intestinal, inmune, productive parameters and bloody biochmistry in chickens
Abstract
The poultry sector has health problems that decrease its productivity, so the objective was to evaluate the effect of microencapsulated L. plantarum in broilers. The characteristics of the microencapsulation (viability, efficiency and physical variables), the productive parameters (dry matter consumption, weight gain and food conversion), biochemicals (cholesterol, triglycerides and total proteins) and histopathological in birds undergoing four treatments were evaluated; two witnesses (without commercial probiotic and probiotic) and two with supply of L. plantarum (with and without microencapsular). The results showed that the strain has adequate growth to different gastrointestinal conditions in vitro, which gives it advantages to cross the gastrointestinal tract. On the other hand, the results for the in vivo study showed that the supply of lactic bacteria have positive effects on the productive parameters, although no comparison was made with other studies due to the particular conditions of the investigation. An increase in cholesterol and triglyceride levels was observed with the supply of the probiotic strain, as well as an increase in histopathological lesions. Microencapsulated L. plantarum has potential as a probiotic additive in the poultry sector, although research on the amount of inoculum to be supplied should be improved
Downloads
References
NKUKWANA, T. Global poultry production: Current impact and future outlook on the South African poultry industry. South African Journal of Animal Science, v. 48, n. 5, 2018, p. 869-884.
4314 / sajas.v48i5.7
SELL-KUBIAK, EWA; WIMMERS, KLAUS; REYER, HENRY; SZWACZKOWSKI, TOMASZ. Genetic aspects of feed efficiency and reduction of environmental footprint in broilers: a review. Journal of applied genetics, v. 58, n. 4, 2017, p. 487-498.
1007/s13353-017-0392-7
GAO, PENGFEI; MA, CHEN; SUN, ZHENG; WANG, LIFENG; HUANG, SHI; SU, XIAQUAN; ZHANG, HEPING. Feed-additive probiotics accelerate yet antibiotics delay intestinal microbiota maturation in broiler chicken. Microbiome, v. 5 , n. 1, p. 91.
http://10.1186/s40168-017-0315-1
AGUNOS, AGENES; LÉGER, DAVID F.; CARSON, CAROLEE A.; GOW, SHERYL P.; BOSMAN, ANGELINA; IRWIN, REBECCA J.; REID-SMITH, RICHARD J. Antimicrobial use surveillance in broiler chicken flocks in Canada, 2013-2015. PloS one, v. 12, n. 6, 2017, p. e0179384.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179384
COYNE, LUC; ARIEF, RIANA; BENIGNO, CAROLYN; GIANG, VO-NGAN; HUONG, LUU-QUYNH, JEAMSRIPONG, SAHARUETAI; KALPRAVIDH, WANTANEE; MCGRANE, JAMES; PADUNGTOD, PAWIN; PATRICK, IAN; SCHOONMAN, LUUK; SETYAWAN, ERRY; SUKARNO, ADY-HARJA; SRISAMRAN, JUTANAT; NGOC, PHAM-THI; RUSHTON, JONATHAN. Characterizing Antimicrobial Use in the Livestock Sector in Three South East Asian Countries (Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam). Antibiotics, v. 8, n. 1, 2019, p. 33-45.
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8010033
WU, ZINPING. Antimicrobial use in food animal production: situation analysis and contributing factors. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, v. 5, n. 3, 2018, p. 301-311. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2018207
HANG- PHAM, THI-THU; ROSSI, PIERRE; KHOA-DINH, HOANG-DANG; ANH-PHAM, NGOC-TU; ANH-TRAN, PHUONG; MUI-HO, OTHI-KHAI; TUC-DINH, QUOC; DE ALENCASTRO, LUIZ-FELIPPE. Analysis of antibiotic multi-resistant bacteria and resistance genes in the effluent of an intensive shrimp farm (Long An, Vietnam). Journal of environmental management, v. 214, 2018, p. 149-156.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.089
GADDE, W.; KIM, W.; ILLEHOJ, HYUN S. Alternatives to antibiotics for maximizing growth performance and feed efficiency in poultry: a review. Animal health research reviews, v. 18, n. 1, 2018, p. 26-45.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252316000207
PLOEGMAKERS, I.B.; OLDE-DAMINK, S.W.; BREUKINK, S.O. Alternatives to antibiotics for prevention of surgical infection. British Journal of Surgery, v. 104, n. 2, 2017, p. e24-e33.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10426
FORD, ALEXANDER C.; HARRIS, LUCINDA, A.; LACY, BRIAN E.; QUIGLEY, EAMONN M.; MOAYYEDI, PAUL. Systematic review with meta‐analysis: the efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, symbiotics and antibiotics in irritable bowel syndrome. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, v. 48, n. 10, 2018, p. 1044-1060.
https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15001
MARKOWIAK, PAULINA; ŚLIŻEWSKA, KATARZYNA. The role of probiotics, prebiotics and symbiotics in animal nutrition. Gut pathogens, v. 10, n. 1, 2018, p. 21-38.
http://10.1186/s13099-018-0250-0
DOWARAH, RUNJUN; VERMA, A.K.; AGARWAL, NEETA. The use of Lactobacillus as an alternative of antibiotic growth promoters in pigs: A review. Animal Nutrition, v. 3, n. 1, 2017, p. 1-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2016.11.002
WANG, YONGWEI; DONG, ZHENGLIN; SONG, DAN; ZHOU, HANG; WANG, WEIWEI; MIAO, HAIJIANG; LI, AIKE; LI, WANG. Effects of microencapsulated probiotics and prebiotics on growth performance, antioxidative abilities, immune functions, and caecal microflora in broiler chickens. Food and agricultural immunology, v. 29, n. 1, 2018, p. 859-869.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540105.2018.1463972
BYAKIKA, STELLAH; MUKISA, IVAN-MUZIRA; BYARUHANGA, YUSUF-BYENKYA; MUYANJA, CHARLES. review of criteria and methods for evaluating the probiotic potential of microorganisms. Food Reviews International, v. 5, n. 2, 2019, p. 1-40.
https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2019.1584815
GADDE, U; KIM, W.H.; OH, S.T; LILLEHOJ, HYUN. Alternatives to antibiotics for maximizing growth performance and feed efficiency in poultry: a review. Animal health research reviews, v. 18, n. 1, 2017, p. 26-45.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252316000207
JURADO-GÁMEZ, HENRY; ORBES-VILLACORTE, ADRIANA-ELIZABETH; MESÍAS-PANTOJA, LAURA-NATHALY. Evaluation in vivo of Lactobacillus plantarum with probiotic characteristics by blood chemistry, immunohisto química and electron microscopy in Cavia porcellus. Biotecnología en el Sector Agropecuario y Agroindustrial, v. 15, n. 2, 2017, p. 11-21.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18684/BSAA(15)11-21
JURADO-GÁMEZ, HENRY; JARRÍN-JARRÍN, VERONICA; BUSTAMANTE-MELO, JESÚS. Efecto bioconservante del sobrenadante de Lactobacillus plantarum y Lactobacillus lactis en lomo de cerdo (Longisimus dorsi). Revista de Medicina Veterinaria, v. 35, 2017 p. 159-173.
http://dx.doi.org/10.19052/mv.4399
RODRÍGUEZ, H; JIMENEZ, T. La microencpasulación. Revista veterinaria del Perú, v. 34, n. 2, 2018, p. 34-41.
COPPOLA-MENEZES, MARIO; GIL-TURNES, CARLOS. Probióticos e resposta imune. Ciência Rural, v. 34, n. 4, 2004, p. 1297-1303.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782004000400056
JUBB, K.; KENNEDY, PETER; PALMER, NIGER. Pathology of Domestic Animals. 6 ed. Washington (USA): Elsevier, Inc. 2016. 670 p.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7020-2823-6.X5001-5
MONTES, LUZ; RODRÍGUEZ-BARONA, SNEYDER; GIRALDO, GLORIA. Encapsulación de alimentos probióticos mediante liofilización en presencia de prebióticos. Información tecnológica, v. 27, n. 6, 2010, p. 135-144.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642016000600014
CHEN, HAIYAN; LI, XIANGYI; LIU, BIENGJIE; MENG, XIANHONG. Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus bulgaricus and survival assays under simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Journal of Functional Foods, v. 29, 2017, p. 248-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2016.12.015
PARRA-HUERTAS, RICARDO-ADOLFO. Revisión: microencapsulación de alimentos. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía, v. 63, n. 2, 2010, p. 5669-5684.
SAMEDI, LESLY; CHARLES, ALBERT-LINTON. Viability of 4 probiotic bacteria microencapsulated with arrowroot starch in the simulated Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT) and yoghurt. Foods, v. 8, n. 5, 2019, p. 175-183.
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8050175
LIAO, LIANGKUN; XIAOYI,WEI; GONG, XIAO; LI, JIHUA; HUANG, TAO; XIONG, TAO. Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus casei LK-1 by spray drying related to its stability and in vitro digestion. LWT-food science and technology, v. 82, 2017, p. 82-89.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.03.065
DINKÇI, NAYIL; AKDENIZ, VILDAL; AKALIN, SIBEL A. Survival of probiotics in functional foods during shelf life. Food Quality and Shelf Life, v. 201, 2019, p. 345-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817190-5.00006-9
RAMOS, PHILIPPE E.; CERQUEIRA, MIGUEL A.; TEIXEIRA, JOSÉ A.; VICENTE, ANTONIO A. Physiological protection of probiotic microcapsules by coatings. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, v. 58, n. 11, 2018, p. 1864-1877.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2017.1289148
MABELEBELE, M; NORRIS, D.; BROWN, D; GININDZA, M.M.; NGAMBI, J.W. Breed and sex differences in the gross anatomy, digesta pH and histomorphology of the gastrointestinal tract of Gallus gallus domesticus. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, v. 19, n. 2, 2017, p. 339-346.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0275
MIN-JU,CHEN; HSINYU, TANG; MING-LUNG, CHIANG. Effects of heat, cold, acid and bile salt adaptations on the stress tolerance and protein expression of kefir-isolated probiotic Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens M1. Food microbiology, v. 66, 2017, p. 20-27.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2017.03.020
MANES-LAZARO, R.; VAN DIEMEN, P.M.; PIN, C.; MAYER, M.J.; STEVENS, M.P. NARBAD, A. Administration of Lactobacillus johnsonii FI9785 to chickens affects colonisation by Campylobacter jejuni and the intestinal microbiota. British poultry science, v. 58, n. 4, 2017, p. 373-381.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2017.1307322
HOSSAIN, M.I.; SADEKUZZAMAN, MOHAMMAD; SAN-DO, HA. Probiotics as potential alternative biocontrol agents in the agriculture and food industries: a review. Food research international, v. 100, 2017, p. 63-73.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.077
MAJIDI-MOSLEH, A.; SADEGHI, A.A.; MOUSAVI, S.N.; CHAMANI, M.; ZAREI, A. Ileal MUC2 gene expression and microbial population, but not growth performance and immune response, are influenced by in ovo injection of probiotics in broiler chickens. British poultry science, v. 58, n. 1, 2017, p. 40-45.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2016.1237766
INATOMI, TAKIO; AMATATSU, MAASAKI; ROMERO-PÉREZ, GUSTAVO-ADOLFO; INOUE, RYO; TSUKAHARA, TAKAMITSU. Dietary probiotic compound improves reproductive performance of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus-infected sows reared in a japanese commercial swine farm under vaccine control condition. Frontiers in Immunology, v. 8, 2017, p. 1877-1883.
Copyright (c) 2020 Universidad del Cauca

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Spanish
English


















.png)


